Литература

1. Armstrong, C., Larcker, D., & Su, C.-L. (2010). Endogenous Selection and Moral Hazard in Compensation Contracts. Oper. Res., 58, 1090-1106.

2. Antonsen, Y (2014) The downside of the balanced scorecard: A case study from Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Management 30(1): 40-50.

3. Ataman, G., & Mumcu A.Y. (2022) Örgüt kuramlarında güncel yaklaşımlar, 148-149 s.

4. Bannister, J.W., Newman, H.A., (2003). Analysis of corporate disclosures on relative performance evaluation. Accounting Horizons 17 (3), 235–246.

5. Bach S (2005) New directions in performance management. In Bach S (ed) Managing Human Resources; Personnel Management In Transition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing: 289-316.

6. Bosse, D., & Phillips, R. (2014). Agency Theory and Bounded Self-Interest. Academy of Management Review, 41, 276-297.

7. Byford, M. C. (2014). Moral-Hazard in Strategic Decision Making. Microeconomics: Decision-Making under Risk & Uncertainty eJournal.

8. Brown Johnson, Nancy, & Scott Droege. 2004. «Reflections on the Generalization of Agency Theory: Cross-Cultural Considerations». Human Resource Management Review 14(3): 325–35. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.06.003.

9. Bergstresser, D., & Philippon, T. 2006. CEO incentives and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 80: 511-29.

10. Bhatt, R., & Bhattacharya, S. (2015). Do Board Characteristics Impact Firm Performance? An Agency and Resource Dependency Theory Perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 11, 274-287.

11. Blau, P. M. (1970). A formal Theory of Differentiation in Organizations. American Sociological Review, (35), 201-218.

12. Burns, T. ve Stalker, G. M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock Publications.

13. Carter, M. E., & Lynch, L. J. 2004. The effect of stock option repricing on employee turnover. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 37: 91-112.

14. Cowden, B. J., Bendickson, J., Bungcayao, J., & Womack, S. (2020). Unicorns and agency theory: Agreeable moral hazard? Journal of Small Business Strategy, 30, 17-25.

15. Cohen, J. R., Holder-Webb, L., Sharp, D. J., & Pant, L. W. 2007. The effects of perceived fairness on opportunistic behavior. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24: 1119-1138.

16. Celentani, Marco, ve Rosa Loveira. 2006. «A Simple Explanation of the Relative Performance Evaluation Puzzle». Review of Economic Dynamics 9(3): 525–40. doi:10.1016/j.red.2006.04.001.

17. Clark, R. C. 1985. Agency costs versus fiduciary duties. In Pratt, J. W., Zeckhauser, R. & Arrow, K. J. (Eds.), Principals and agents: The structure of business. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

18. Dawar, V. (2014). Agency Theory, Capital Structure and Firm Performance: Some Indian Evidence. Managerial Finance, 40(12), 1190-1206.

19. Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, C. M. 2007. The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation. Academy of Management Annals, 1: 1-64.

20. Davis G (2009) The rise and fall of finance and the end of the society of organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives 23(3): 27-44.

21. Douthit, J., Kearney, L. W., & Stevens, D. (2012). Can Agent Cheap Talk Mitigate Agency Problems in the Presence of a Noisy Performance Measure? An Experimental Test in a Single- and Multi-Period Setting. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 24, 135-158.

22. Donaldson, L. (2006). The Contingency Theory of Organizational Design: Challenges and Opportunities. R. M. Burton, B. Eriksen, D. D. Hakansson ve C.C. Snow (Der.) Organizational Design: The Evolving State-of-the-Art. 19-40. New York: Springer.

23. Donaldson, L. (2001). The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

24. Denis, D. J., Hanouna, P., & Sarin, A. 2006. Is there a dark side to incentive compensation? Journal of Corporate Finance, 12: 467-88.

25. Denisi A and Smith C (2014) Performance appraisal, performance management, and firm-level performance: A review, a proposed model, and new directions for Future research. Academy of Management Annals 8(1): 127-179.

26. Evans, S., & Tourish, D. (2017). Agency theory and performance appraisal: How bad theory damages learning and contributes to bad management practice. Management Learning, 48, 271-291.

27. Edwards P and Wajcman J (2005) The Politics of Working Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

28. Eisenhardt, K. (1985) Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Science, 31, 134- 149.

29. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14: 57-74.

30. Fama, E.F., Jensen, M.C. (1983). Agency Problems and Residual Claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.

31. Fama, E. (1980) Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288-307.

32. Garg, V. K. & Rasheed. A. A. (2003). International Multi-Unit Franchizing: An Agency Theoretic Explanation. International Busines Review, 12, 329-348.

33. Gerhart, B., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Compensation: Theory, evidence, and strategic implications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

34. Goddard M, Mannion R and Smith P (2000) Assessing the performance of NHS Hospital Trusts: the role of ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ information. Health Policy 48(2): 119-134.

35. Grossman, S. J., and O. D. Hart (1983), “An Analysis of the Principal-agent Problem,” Econometrica, 52, 1-45.

36. Gomez-Majia, L and Balkin D (1992) Compensation, Organizational Strategy and Firm Performance. Cincinnati: Southwestern.

37. Garvey, G.T., Milbourn, T.T., 2006. Asymmetric benchmarking in compensation: Executives are rewarded for good luck but not penalized for bad, Journal of Financial Economics, in press.

38. Handel, M. J. (2003). Organizations as Rational Systems II: Contingency Theory and the Discovery of Organizational Variation. M. J. Handel (Der.), The Sociology of Organizations: Classic, Contemporary, and Critical Readings. 39-44. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

39. Heron, R. A., & Lie, E. 2007. Does backdating explain the stock price pattern around executive stock option grants? Journal of Financial Economics, 83: 271-95.

40. Hendry J (2002). The principal’s other problems: Honest incompetence and the specification of objectives. Academy of Management Review, 27(1): 98-113.

41. Holmstrom B. (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics 10(1): 74–91.

42. Ishiguro, S., & Yasuda, Y. (2021). Moral Hazard and Subjective Evaluation. ERN: Non-Cooperative Games (Topic).

43. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. F. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-60.

44. Kambe, S. (2006), “Subjective Evaluation in Agency Contracts,” Japanese Economic Review, 57, 121―140.

45. Karminsky A.M., Polozov A.A., Ermakov S.P., (2016) "Encyclopedia of ratings" - Moscow, 2016 - 54-89 p.

46. Kunst, V. E., & Beugelsdijk, S. (2018). Managerial Ownership and Firm Performance: The Cultural Boundaries of Agency Theory. Academy of Management Proceedings.

47. Kulkarni, S. P., & Ramamoorthy, N. (2017). The Psychological Foundations of Supervisor–Subordinate Information Asymmetry. Organization Studies, 38, 1445-1466.

48. Kohn A (1993) Punished by Rewards. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

49. Lan, L. L., & Heracleous, L. (2010). Rethinking Agency Theory: The View from Law. Academy of Management Review, 35, 294-314.

50. Levin, J. (2002), “Multilateral Contracting and the Employment Relationships,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1075-1103.

51. Levy P and Williams J (2004) The social context of performance appraisal: a review and framework for the future. Journal of Management 30(6): 881-905.

52. Linder, S., & Foss, N. (2013). Agency Theory. Corporate Governance & Finance eJournal.

53. Li, R., & Wang, M. (2018). Moral Hazard, Agency Cost, and Firm Growth. Corporate Governance: Capital Raising.

54. Lie, E. 2005. On the timing of CEO stock option awards. Management Science, 51: 802-12.

55. Mallin, C., Melis, A., & Gaia, S. (2015). The remuneration of independent directors in the UK and Italy: An empirical analysis based on agency theory. International Business Review, 24, 175-186.

56. MacLeod, B. W. (2003), “Optimal Contracting with Subjective Evaluation,” American Economic Review, 93, 216-240.

57. Marsden D (2010) The paradox of performance related pay systems: ‘why do we keep adopting them in the face of evidence that they fail to motivate?’, In Margetts H, Perri 6 and Hood C (eds) (2010) Paradoxes Of Modernization: Unintended Consequences Of Public Policy Reforms. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 185-202.

58. Moloi, T., & Marwala, T. (2020). The Agency Theory.

59. Monks K, Kelly G Conway E Flood P Truss K and Hannon E (2012) Understanding how HR systems work: The role of HR philosophy and HR processes. Human Resource Management Journal 23(4): 379-395.

60. Nikols F (2007) Performance appraisal: weighed and found wanting in the balance. The Journal for Quality and Participation 13-16.

61. Payne, G. T., & Petrenko, O. (2019). Agency Theory in Business and Management Research. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management.

62. Pfeffer and Sutton R (2006) Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths, and Total Nonsense: Profiting from Evidence-based Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

63. Pfeffer, J. (1981) Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pittman.

64. Pettigrew, A. (1973) The politics of organizational decision making. London: Tavistock.

65. Pepper A, Gosling T and Gore J (2015) Fairness, envy, guilt and greed: Building equity considerations into agency theory. Human Relations, 68(8): 1291-1314.

66. Ramaswami, S., Srinivasan, S., & Gorton, S. A. (2013). Information Asymmetry Between Salesperson and Supervisor: Postulates from Agency and Social Exchange Theories. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management.

67. Sandres, V.M.G. & Hambrick, D.C. (2007). Swinging for the Fences the Effects of Ceo Stock Option on Company Risk Taking and Performance. Academy of Management journal, 50(5), 1055-1078.  

68. Sameera K.P.H. (2020). Moral Hazard: A Hidden-Information Agency Perspective.

69. Spencer D (2013) Barbarians at the gate: a critical appraisal of the influence of economics on the field and practice of HRM. Human Resource Management Journal 23(4): 346-359.

70. Stout, L. 2012. The shareholder value myth. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

71. Smith P (1993) Organizational outcome-related performance indicators and control in the public sector. British Journal of Management 4(3): 135-151.

72. Townley B (1993) Performance appraisal and the emergence of management. Journal of Management Studies 30(2): 221-238.

73. Tourish D (2006) The appraisal interview reappraised, in Hargie O. (ed.) A Handbook of Communication Skills (3rd Edition), London: Routledge, 505-530.

74. Van de Ven, A. H., & Lifschitz, A. 2013. Rational and reasonable microfoundations of markets and institutions. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27: 156-172.

75. Ward A. (2005) Whither Performance Management? Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies.

76. Wowak, A. J., & Hambrick, D. C. 2010. A model of person-pay interaction: How executives vary in their responses to compensation arrangements. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 803-21.